<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1509 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197915</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions to exclude certain companies from the list of comparables, reject the inclusion of others, and adjust the calculation for the deduction under Section 10A of the Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on functional comparability, revenue filters, and adherence to established legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1509 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197915</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions to exclude certain companies from the list of comparables, reject the inclusion of others, and adjust the calculation for the deduction under Section 10A of the Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on functional comparability, revenue filters, and adherence to established legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>