<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1320 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197916</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court, in a judgment by Mr. T.S.Sivagnanam, J., addressed discrepancies in a writ petition involving incorrect details and suppression of goods in Bills of Entry by a regular importer. The petitioner was directed to assess duty on specific items like Glass Crystal Beeds, Smile Balls, Wooden Sticks, Assorted Ladies Garments, and Baby Chairs within a specified timeframe. The court dismissed the petition regarding Cotton Shoes, Empty Shoe Boxes, and Shoes with &#039;Nike&#039; and &#039;Adidas&#039; brands due to objections from trademark holders. Compliance with the duty assessment directive was mandated within two weeks, emphasizing the importance of accurate declarations and timely compliance in importation matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1320 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197916</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court, in a judgment by Mr. T.S.Sivagnanam, J., addressed discrepancies in a writ petition involving incorrect details and suppression of goods in Bills of Entry by a regular importer. The petitioner was directed to assess duty on specific items like Glass Crystal Beeds, Smile Balls, Wooden Sticks, Assorted Ladies Garments, and Baby Chairs within a specified timeframe. The court dismissed the petition regarding Cotton Shoes, Empty Shoe Boxes, and Shoes with &#039;Nike&#039; and &#039;Adidas&#039; brands due to objections from trademark holders. Compliance with the duty assessment directive was mandated within two weeks, emphasizing the importance of accurate declarations and timely compliance in importation matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>