https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197910 Review jurisdiction under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is purely statutory and cannot be invoked against an order under Section 34 unless the Act itself confers that power. Reliance on Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected because the Act regulates judicial intervention and does not import a general review power. On limitation, Article 124 of the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes thirty days for a review application, and the petition had been filed well after that period without adequate pleadings for exclusion of time or any condonation request. The review was therefore not maintainable and was time-barred. en-us Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:47:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197910 Review jurisdiction under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is purely statutory and cannot be invoked against an order under Section 34 unless the Act itself confers that power. Reliance on Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected because the Act regulates judicial intervention and does not import a general review power. On limitation, Article 124 of the Limitation Act, 1963 prescribes thirty days for a review application, and the petition had been filed well after that period without adequate pleadings for exclusion of time or any condonation request. The review was therefore not maintainable and was time-barred. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197910