https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197908 Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a review petition is not maintainable against an order passed under section 34 unless the Act expressly confers a power of review. Section 5 limits judicial intervention in matters governed by Part I, and review being a substantive jurisdiction must arise from clear statutory authorization. Reliance on authorities dealing with appellate or revisional powers was treated as inapposite because they did not recognise any general review power under the Act. Treating the Act as a self-contained code, the court held that, in the absence of statutory permission, the review application could not be entertained and was dismissed. en-us Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:28:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197908 Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a review petition is not maintainable against an order passed under section 34 unless the Act expressly confers a power of review. Section 5 limits judicial intervention in matters governed by Part I, and review being a substantive jurisdiction must arise from clear statutory authorization. Reliance on authorities dealing with appellate or revisional powers was treated as inapposite because they did not recognise any general review power under the Act. Treating the Act as a self-contained code, the court held that, in the absence of statutory permission, the review application could not be entertained and was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197908