https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197904 An order passed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not open to substantive review on merits, because review is not inherent and must be expressly conferred by law. Only a procedural review is permissible where the proceeding is vitiated by a procedural illegality such as absence of notice or denial of hearing. A recall application based on alleged prior commencement of arbitration or limitation was rejected because those objections sought re-agitation of matters already decided and no procedural defect or error apparent on the face of the record was shown. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:06:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197904 An order passed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not open to substantive review on merits, because review is not inherent and must be expressly conferred by law. Only a procedural review is permissible where the proceeding is vitiated by a procedural illegality such as absence of notice or denial of hearing. A recall application based on alleged prior commencement of arbitration or limitation was rejected because those objections sought re-agitation of matters already decided and no procedural defect or error apparent on the face of the record was shown. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197904