https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197894 The court upheld the validity of the temporary arrangement for a presiding officer in the absence of a regular appointment, authorized by the Government under relevant provisions. It clarified that the term "temporary absence" included a situation of a permanent vacancy until a regular appointment is made. Despite challenges raised, the court found the appointment justified as the selection committee could not find an eligible candidate meeting the qualifications. The petitioner's appeal was allowed to proceed before the Appellate Tribunal, with the court dismissing the writ petition without delving into the merits of the challenge to the adjudication order. en-us Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197894 The court upheld the validity of the temporary arrangement for a presiding officer in the absence of a regular appointment, authorized by the Government under relevant provisions. It clarified that the term "temporary absence" included a situation of a permanent vacancy until a regular appointment is made. Despite challenges raised, the court found the appointment justified as the selection committee could not find an eligible candidate meeting the qualifications. The petitioner's appeal was allowed to proceed before the Appellate Tribunal, with the court dismissing the writ petition without delving into the merits of the challenge to the adjudication order. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197894