<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1157 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197891</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, setting aside the order of the CIT(A) and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 3,38,250. The Tribunal considered the timing of the services rendered and the accrual of income in determining the correct assessment year for the disputed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:32:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1157 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197891</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, setting aside the order of the CIT(A) and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 3,38,250. The Tribunal considered the timing of the services rendered and the accrual of income in determining the correct assessment year for the disputed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>