https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197889 A review under section 8C(2) of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act is confined to the statutory grounds expressly stated, so a mere challenge to the earlier appreciation of evidence or merits is insufficient without fresh material; the review request was rejected on that basis. The Kerala Private Forests (Exemption from Vesting) Rules, 1974 could provide an additional procedure before the Custodian, but they could not curtail the Forest Tribunal's jurisdiction under the Act to decide whether land was excluded from vesting or had vested in the Government; the challenge to jurisdiction was rejected. en-us Mon, 15 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:15:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197889 A review under section 8C(2) of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act is confined to the statutory grounds expressly stated, so a mere challenge to the earlier appreciation of evidence or merits is insufficient without fresh material; the review request was rejected on that basis. The Kerala Private Forests (Exemption from Vesting) Rules, 1974 could provide an additional procedure before the Custodian, but they could not curtail the Forest Tribunal's jurisdiction under the Act to decide whether land was excluded from vesting or had vested in the Government; the challenge to jurisdiction was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 15 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197889