<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 618 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197888</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the requested amendment to change the name of the bank in the complaint was not permissible under the Criminal Procedure Code. The court set aside the order allowing the amendment, emphasizing that the change constituted a substantial alteration to the complaint. The court directed the applicant to pursue a revision for the other prayer clause, ultimately disposing of the application accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:07:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 618 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197888</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the requested amendment to change the name of the bank in the complaint was not permissible under the Criminal Procedure Code. The court set aside the order allowing the amendment, emphasizing that the change constituted a substantial alteration to the complaint. The court directed the applicant to pursue a revision for the other prayer clause, ultimately disposing of the application accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>