https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197866 Post-employment restraints that bar an employee from joining a third party or dealing with present, past or prospective customers are void as a restraint of trade under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, unless confined to the period of employment. The court found no identified trade secret, technical know-how, or confidential information whose disclosure required protection, so no injunction could be justified on that basis. It also held that the relief sought was not specifically enforceable or capable of effective supervision, attracting the bar under Section 41(e) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, read with Sections 14(c) and 14(d). en-us Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:06:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197866 Post-employment restraints that bar an employee from joining a third party or dealing with present, past or prospective customers are void as a restraint of trade under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, unless confined to the period of employment. The court found no identified trade secret, technical know-how, or confidential information whose disclosure required protection, so no injunction could be justified on that basis. It also held that the relief sought was not specifically enforceable or capable of effective supervision, attracting the bar under Section 41(e) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, read with Sections 14(c) and 14(d). Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197866