<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 813 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354077</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a legal heir, in a case challenging an order implementing an ITAT remand order related to tax assessment for the year 2007-2008. The court found that despite a reduction in tax liability, the corresponding interest reduction under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not granted. The court noted the petitioner&#039;s compliance with payment directives and declined the revenue&#039;s request for further tax payment, emphasizing the need for a review of the interest charges. The court directed no additional tax or interest payment until the appeal is resolved, urging a prompt decision within four months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 20:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 813 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354077</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a legal heir, in a case challenging an order implementing an ITAT remand order related to tax assessment for the year 2007-2008. The court found that despite a reduction in tax liability, the corresponding interest reduction under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was not granted. The court noted the petitioner&#039;s compliance with payment directives and declined the revenue&#039;s request for further tax payment, emphasizing the need for a review of the interest charges. The court directed no additional tax or interest payment until the appeal is resolved, urging a prompt decision within four months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>