<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 805 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354069</link>
    <description>Delhi HC held that unsold residential flats held as stock-in-trade by the assessee were taxable under Income from House Property provisions rather than business income. The court ruled that despite Section 23(1)(c) amendment effective April 2002, properties never actually let out cannot claim its benefit. The notional annual letting value method under Section 23(1)(a) applies to such properties. Section 23(5) inserted from April 2018 operates prospectively only, not covering the relevant assessment years. The amendment&#039;s language indicates legislative intent that this situation wasn&#039;t previously covered by existing provisions. Decision against assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 11:50:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 805 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354069</link>
      <description>Delhi HC held that unsold residential flats held as stock-in-trade by the assessee were taxable under Income from House Property provisions rather than business income. The court ruled that despite Section 23(1)(c) amendment effective April 2002, properties never actually let out cannot claim its benefit. The notional annual letting value method under Section 23(1)(a) applies to such properties. Section 23(5) inserted from April 2018 operates prospectively only, not covering the relevant assessment years. The amendment&#039;s language indicates legislative intent that this situation wasn&#039;t previously covered by existing provisions. Decision against assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>