<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 784 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354048</link>
    <description>Section 80P deduction is unavailable to a co-operative bank unless it falls within the statutory exceptions in section 80P(4); a society whose area of operation is not confined to a taluk does not satisfy the definition of a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. On the assessee&#039;s bye-laws, its area of operation extended beyond a taluk, so it could not claim the exception and the denial of deduction was upheld in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:02:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 784 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354048</link>
      <description>Section 80P deduction is unavailable to a co-operative bank unless it falls within the statutory exceptions in section 80P(4); a society whose area of operation is not confined to a taluk does not satisfy the definition of a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. On the assessee&#039;s bye-laws, its area of operation extended beyond a taluk, so it could not claim the exception and the denial of deduction was upheld in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>