<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 775 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354039</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that they had purchased the DEPB scrips in good faith without involvement in the fraud. Citing relevant judicial precedents, the Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 775 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354039</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that they had purchased the DEPB scrips in good faith without involvement in the fraud. Citing relevant judicial precedents, the Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>