https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354036 A non-bailable warrant issued against an accused after he had already undergone the full substantive and default sentence was held without jurisdiction and illegal, so continued coercive execution for the same sentence was barred. Compensation ordered under Section 357(3) CrPC was treated as recoverable as if it were a fine under Section 431 read with Section 421, and the recovery process could proceed through distress warrant proceedings even without a formal application by the complainant or legal representatives. The court upheld the recovery action, subject to notice to the deceased complainant's legal representatives. en-us Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:01:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354036 A non-bailable warrant issued against an accused after he had already undergone the full substantive and default sentence was held without jurisdiction and illegal, so continued coercive execution for the same sentence was barred. Compensation ordered under Section 357(3) CrPC was treated as recoverable as if it were a fine under Section 431 read with Section 421, and the recovery process could proceed through distress warrant proceedings even without a formal application by the complainant or legal representatives. The court upheld the recovery action, subject to notice to the deceased complainant's legal representatives. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354036