<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 765 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order demanding duty and penalty for alleged clandestine removal of goods by the fabric processor. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient to establish clandestine activities, noting the lack of conclusive evidence linking the appellant to the alleged wrongdoing. The recovery of blue note books alone was deemed insufficient, and the absence of details on recipients of goods or evidence of clandestine purchase of raw materials weakened the case against the appellant. Previous cases with similar allegations were referenced to support the decision to dismiss the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 765 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order demanding duty and penalty for alleged clandestine removal of goods by the fabric processor. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient to establish clandestine activities, noting the lack of conclusive evidence linking the appellant to the alleged wrongdoing. The recovery of blue note books alone was deemed insufficient, and the absence of details on recipients of goods or evidence of clandestine purchase of raw materials weakened the case against the appellant. Previous cases with similar allegations were referenced to support the decision to dismiss the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>