https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197849 A separately executed services agreement containing an arbitration clause remained enforceable because neither the later tripartite share purchase agreement nor the letter of intent clearly established novation, rescission, or supersession. The termination of the share purchase agreement did not extinguish the earlier contractual arrangement, and the letter of intent was only an agreement to enter into another agreement. The dispute under the services agreement was therefore live and arbitrable, and the applicant was entitled to invoke the arbitration clause and seek appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6). en-us Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197849 A separately executed services agreement containing an arbitration clause remained enforceable because neither the later tripartite share purchase agreement nor the letter of intent clearly established novation, rescission, or supersession. The termination of the share purchase agreement did not extinguish the earlier contractual arrangement, and the letter of intent was only an agreement to enter into another agreement. The dispute under the services agreement was therefore live and arbitrable, and the applicant was entitled to invoke the arbitration clause and seek appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6). Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197849