<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (10) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197846</link>
    <description>Where no suit is pending, parties may enforce an arbitral award made on a voluntary reference without court intervention, and consent at the stage of the award is not required for enforcement. The award was also not invalid merely because Dulari Bahu had not joined the arbitration agreement, since her maintenance rights were not prejudiced and the issue had become academic. Prior litigation concerning the same property did not bar a fresh dispute over that property from being referred to arbitration, as the earlier proceedings did not extinguish the parties&#039; freedom to arbitrate the later controversy. The award was upheld and treated as a valid adjudication between the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (10) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197846</link>
      <description>Where no suit is pending, parties may enforce an arbitral award made on a voluntary reference without court intervention, and consent at the stage of the award is not required for enforcement. The award was also not invalid merely because Dulari Bahu had not joined the arbitration agreement, since her maintenance rights were not prejudiced and the issue had become academic. Prior litigation concerning the same property did not bar a fresh dispute over that property from being referred to arbitration, as the earlier proceedings did not extinguish the parties&#039; freedom to arbitrate the later controversy. The award was upheld and treated as a valid adjudication between the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>