<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11463</link>
    <description>Section 154 rectification cannot be used to disallow sales tax under section 43B where the assessee disputed the adjustment and the character of the receipt itself was debatable. The High Court noted that the amount was not shown in the profit and loss account and that more than one view was possible on whether it could be treated as disallowable liability. In the absence of a mistake apparent from the record, rectification was impermissible and the disallowance failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11463</link>
      <description>Section 154 rectification cannot be used to disallow sales tax under section 43B where the assessee disputed the adjustment and the character of the receipt itself was debatable. The High Court noted that the amount was not shown in the profit and loss account and that more than one view was possible on whether it could be treated as disallowable liability. In the absence of a mistake apparent from the record, rectification was impermissible and the disallowance failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>