https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197845 A contract that treated each month's delivery as a distinct and separate contract allowed arbitration of later defaults even after an earlier award on a prior claim. The arbitration clause was read as extending to each dispute arising as it occurred under the contract, so the first reference did not exhaust the contractual right to arbitrate subsequent breaches. A second or later arbitral proceeding was therefore competent, and the objection based on prior adjudication failed. en-us Wed, 14 Jan 1920 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:05:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197845 A contract that treated each month's delivery as a distinct and separate contract allowed arbitration of later defaults even after an earlier award on a prior claim. The arbitration clause was read as extending to each dispute arising as it occurred under the contract, so the first reference did not exhaust the contractual right to arbitrate subsequent breaches. A second or later arbitral proceeding was therefore competent, and the objection based on prior adjudication failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 14 Jan 1920 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197845