https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197836 Failure to file a written statement despite repeated opportunities may justify recourse to Order VIII Rule 10 CPC, but the court should still scrutinise the plaint and supporting material before granting relief. In copyright and trade mark disputes, prior use, registered mark, protected artistic works, and use of an identical or deceptively similar mark and get-up may establish infringement and passing off. On that basis, permanent injunction may be granted, while rendition of accounts may be declined where profits cannot be ascertained and damages awarded instead. en-us Wed, 18 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:20:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197836 Failure to file a written statement despite repeated opportunities may justify recourse to Order VIII Rule 10 CPC, but the court should still scrutinise the plaint and supporting material before granting relief. In copyright and trade mark disputes, prior use, registered mark, protected artistic works, and use of an identical or deceptively similar mark and get-up may establish infringement and passing off. On that basis, permanent injunction may be granted, while rendition of accounts may be declined where profits cannot be ascertained and damages awarded instead. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197836