https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197834 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeal with costs. The appellant's claim to land based on an alleged gallantry award was unsupported by genuine evidence. The challenge to the Rehabilitation Minister's order was deemed irrelevant as the Commissioner independently verified and reaffirmed the cancellation of the allotment, concluding that the appellant was not entitled to the land. en-us Wed, 09 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:10:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197834 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeal with costs. The appellant's claim to land based on an alleged gallantry award was unsupported by genuine evidence. The challenge to the Rehabilitation Minister's order was deemed irrelevant as the Commissioner independently verified and reaffirmed the cancellation of the allotment, concluding that the appellant was not entitled to the land. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197834