<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 657 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197833</link>
    <description>The Chief Justice of a High Court controls roster allocation and bench constitution under the constitutional and procedural scheme, and even a part-heard matter may be transferred to the Bench required by the Rules. A Single Judge cannot, in collateral proceedings, call for the record of a disposed writ petition, comment on its transfer or disposal, or issue contempt notice to the Chief Justice for exercising roster powers. Adverse remarks against former Chief Justices were also unsustainable where made without notice and on an incorrect factual premise about daily allowance and accommodation, so such observations were liable to expunction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 657 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197833</link>
      <description>The Chief Justice of a High Court controls roster allocation and bench constitution under the constitutional and procedural scheme, and even a part-heard matter may be transferred to the Bench required by the Rules. A Single Judge cannot, in collateral proceedings, call for the record of a disposed writ petition, comment on its transfer or disposal, or issue contempt notice to the Chief Justice for exercising roster powers. Adverse remarks against former Chief Justices were also unsustainable where made without notice and on an incorrect factual premise about daily allowance and accommodation, so such observations were liable to expunction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>