<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 285 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197827</link>
    <description>A transfer of shop premises and business will be protected only if it falls within the notification allowing assignment of a live business as a going concern, together with stock-in-trade and goodwill. On the recorded facts, the business had stopped, no trading activity had occurred for over a year, and no stock-in-trade was shown to exist at the time of transfer. The assignment was therefore treated as a colourable device to transfer tenancy rights rather than a permitted transfer, and the burden of bringing the case within the exception was not discharged. The request to reopen the factual record was also rejected for want of sufficient basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 18:03:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 285 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197827</link>
      <description>A transfer of shop premises and business will be protected only if it falls within the notification allowing assignment of a live business as a going concern, together with stock-in-trade and goodwill. On the recorded facts, the business had stopped, no trading activity had occurred for over a year, and no stock-in-trade was shown to exist at the time of transfer. The assignment was therefore treated as a colourable device to transfer tenancy rights rather than a permitted transfer, and the burden of bringing the case within the exception was not discharged. The request to reopen the factual record was also rejected for want of sufficient basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>