<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 38 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11460</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the transfer of a building on leased land included both the building and the leasehold right. The Court agreed that the consideration received was for both components, exempting it from capital gains tax. The Court deemed Rs. 1 lakh as a reasonable consideration for the transfer of the leasehold right.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 38 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11460</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the transfer of a building on leased land included both the building and the leasehold right. The Court agreed that the consideration received was for both components, exempting it from capital gains tax. The Court deemed Rs. 1 lakh as a reasonable consideration for the transfer of the leasehold right.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>