<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1472 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197822</link>
    <description>The appeal in this case involved challenges to the assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2006-07. The issues included the allowance of deduction under section 80-IB(10) of the Act and the deletion of an addition of Rs. 20,00,000 based on a partner&#039;s statement during survey proceedings. The CIT(A)&#039;s conclusions were upheld by the Bombay High Court, and the ITAT affirmed the deletion of the addition, emphasizing that additions cannot solely rely on survey statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:29:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1472 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197822</link>
      <description>The appeal in this case involved challenges to the assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2006-07. The issues included the allowance of deduction under section 80-IB(10) of the Act and the deletion of an addition of Rs. 20,00,000 based on a partner&#039;s statement during survey proceedings. The CIT(A)&#039;s conclusions were upheld by the Bombay High Court, and the ITAT affirmed the deletion of the addition, emphasizing that additions cannot solely rely on survey statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>