https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197821 The Central Information Commission held that the Ministry of Finance was not obligated to transfer an RTI application to other public authorities under Section 6(3) of the RTI Act. It directed the Ministry to appoint a CPIO within one month and provide relevant RBI guidelines to the appellant. The Commission emphasized the need for a more categorical response on the legality of presenting a garland made of currency notes to a public functionary. Despite uncertainty on the relevant public authority for certain queries, the appeal was disposed of, with copies of the order provided to the parties at no cost. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:43:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197821 The Central Information Commission held that the Ministry of Finance was not obligated to transfer an RTI application to other public authorities under Section 6(3) of the RTI Act. It directed the Ministry to appoint a CPIO within one month and provide relevant RBI guidelines to the appellant. The Commission emphasized the need for a more categorical response on the legality of presenting a garland made of currency notes to a public functionary. Despite uncertainty on the relevant public authority for certain queries, the appeal was disposed of, with copies of the order provided to the parties at no cost. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197821