<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 1008 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197812</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the High Court&#039;s order for summoning witnesses in a criminal case. The Court emphasized that the power to record additional evidence under Section 391 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be exercised judiciously, with reasons provided. It found that the High Court did not apply these principles properly when ordering the witness to appear, especially considering the contradictory affidavit already filed. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a fresh assessment by the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 1008 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197812</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the High Court&#039;s order for summoning witnesses in a criminal case. The Court emphasized that the power to record additional evidence under Section 391 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be exercised judiciously, with reasons provided. It found that the High Court did not apply these principles properly when ordering the witness to appear, especially considering the contradictory affidavit already filed. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a fresh assessment by the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>