https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197811 The Supreme Court held that the State Electricity Board could not unilaterally enhance electricity rates despite existing agreements with the appellant. The agreements were made in exercise of statutory power under Section 49(3) of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948, and the Board could not override them. The Court quashed the notification seeking to apply revised tariffs, restrained the Board from enforcing them, and directed adherence to the charges in the agreements. The appeal was allowed, with costs awarded to the appellant. en-us Wed, 23 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Dec 2019 18:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197811 The Supreme Court held that the State Electricity Board could not unilaterally enhance electricity rates despite existing agreements with the appellant. The agreements were made in exercise of statutory power under Section 49(3) of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948, and the Board could not override them. The Court quashed the notification seeking to apply revised tariffs, restrained the Board from enforcing them, and directed adherence to the charges in the agreements. The appeal was allowed, with costs awarded to the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197811