https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197808 The plaintiff was denied interim injunctive relief under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC because the interim arrangement had been replaced by a later arrangement and the entitlement to injunction had already been negatived in connected proceedings before the Single Judge and Division Bench. As that prior adjudication removed the foundation for interim protection, the court held that no basis remained to grant the requested injunction, and the interim relief application was dismissed. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:12:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197808 The plaintiff was denied interim injunctive relief under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC because the interim arrangement had been replaced by a later arrangement and the entitlement to injunction had already been negatived in connected proceedings before the Single Judge and Division Bench. As that prior adjudication removed the foundation for interim protection, the court held that no basis remained to grant the requested injunction, and the interim relief application was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197808