https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197805 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, the court found that presentation of the cheque, dishonour for insufficiency of funds, statutory notice, and non-payment were proved, and that the accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act; the conviction under Section 138 was therefore upheld. The court also held that the fine imposed by the Magistrate exceeded the permissible limit under Section 29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, so the sentence was modified by treating part of the amount as compensation while leaving the conviction undisturbed. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:28:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197805 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, the court found that presentation of the cheque, dishonour for insufficiency of funds, statutory notice, and non-payment were proved, and that the accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act; the conviction under Section 138 was therefore upheld. The court also held that the fine imposed by the Magistrate exceeded the permissible limit under Section 29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, so the sentence was modified by treating part of the amount as compensation while leaving the conviction undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197805