<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 586 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197805</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the conviction under Section 138 of the NI Act but modified the sentence to comply with legal provisions. The revisional application was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to pay the modified amount within 60 days. The court found no grounds for a retrial, upholding the decisions of the lower courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:28:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 586 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197805</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the conviction under Section 138 of the NI Act but modified the sentence to comply with legal provisions. The revisional application was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to pay the modified amount within 60 days. The court found no grounds for a retrial, upholding the decisions of the lower courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>