<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 583 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197801</link>
    <description>A decree passed on admission, recognising an existing family arrangement and relinquishment in immovable property, did not require registration under the Registration Act, 1908. Section 17(2)(vi) exempts decrees and orders of court relating only to the subject matter of the suit from compulsory registration, unless the compromise extends to property outside the suit or creates rights for the first time. As the decree merely acknowledged pre-existing rights rather than creating a new right in praesenti, it remained admissible in evidence to prove co-ownership and entitlement under the family arrangement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:58:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 583 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197801</link>
      <description>A decree passed on admission, recognising an existing family arrangement and relinquishment in immovable property, did not require registration under the Registration Act, 1908. Section 17(2)(vi) exempts decrees and orders of court relating only to the subject matter of the suit from compulsory registration, unless the compromise extends to property outside the suit or creates rights for the first time. As the decree merely acknowledged pre-existing rights rather than creating a new right in praesenti, it remained admissible in evidence to prove co-ownership and entitlement under the family arrangement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>