https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197793 Prior user rights in the mark USHA were supported by continuous use from 1936 and long-standing registrations, including registrations treated as conclusively valid under Section 32 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The defendants' later and limited association with the mark, mainly for industrial goods, did not displace that priority. Use of USHA in corporate names, trade descriptions and advertisements was found likely to cause confusion and to amount to infringement and passing off; the plea of bona fide use of one's own name was not accepted where no concurrent right was shown. Interlocutory restraint was granted, subject to a limited allowance for specified industrial goods. en-us Wed, 04 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197793 Prior user rights in the mark USHA were supported by continuous use from 1936 and long-standing registrations, including registrations treated as conclusively valid under Section 32 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The defendants' later and limited association with the mark, mainly for industrial goods, did not displace that priority. Use of USHA in corporate names, trade descriptions and advertisements was found likely to cause confusion and to amount to infringement and passing off; the plea of bona fide use of one's own name was not accepted where no concurrent right was shown. Interlocutory restraint was granted, subject to a limited allowance for specified industrial goods. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197793