<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1055 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197792</link>
    <description>A registered and reputed trade mark is protected against use of an identical or deceptively similar mark in trade, including where it is adopted as part of a business or corporate name. The note also explains that passing off arises where the impugned adoption is likely to mislead consumers, damage goodwill, and create an association with the earlier mark. It further states that device marks may be assessed on overall visual impression for deceptive similarity. Delay or alleged prior user does not generally defeat interim relief where the adoption appears dishonest and the infringement is continuing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1055 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197792</link>
      <description>A registered and reputed trade mark is protected against use of an identical or deceptively similar mark in trade, including where it is adopted as part of a business or corporate name. The note also explains that passing off arises where the impugned adoption is likely to mislead consumers, damage goodwill, and create an association with the earlier mark. It further states that device marks may be assessed on overall visual impression for deceptive similarity. Delay or alleged prior user does not generally defeat interim relief where the adoption appears dishonest and the infringement is continuing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>