<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1220 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197791</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the quashing of the Order-in-Appeal due to finished stock shortage detected within the premises. The penalty imposed on the assessee was increased to Rs. 16,383, equivalent to the duty involved on the goods seized from the intercepted truck, in accordance with legal precedents. The appeal was disposed of, affirming the assessee&#039;s liability to pay the penalty determined by the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:09:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1220 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197791</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the quashing of the Order-in-Appeal due to finished stock shortage detected within the premises. The penalty imposed on the assessee was increased to Rs. 16,383, equivalent to the duty involved on the goods seized from the intercepted truck, in accordance with legal precedents. The appeal was disposed of, affirming the assessee&#039;s liability to pay the penalty determined by the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>