<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 18 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11450</link>
    <description>Retirement of a partner from a partnership firm, even where new partners are inducted on the same occasion, does not by itself constitute a transfer amounting to a taxable gift. The Kerala HC applied the settled principle already affirmed by the Supreme Court and found no distinguishing feature in the admission of new partners on retirement. On that basis, it concluded that no element of gift arose and the matter was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 18 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11450</link>
      <description>Retirement of a partner from a partnership firm, even where new partners are inducted on the same occasion, does not by itself constitute a transfer amounting to a taxable gift. The Kerala HC applied the settled principle already affirmed by the Supreme Court and found no distinguishing feature in the admission of new partners on retirement. On that basis, it concluded that no element of gift arose and the matter was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>