<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 744 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354008</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in the case involving the interpretation of Section 2(r) Explanation 1-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. It was held that showing the tax separately in the books of accounts was sufficient compliance for claiming deduction, even if not on the sale bills. Additionally, the penalty under Section 12(3)(b) for the assessment year was deemed unjustified, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Case Revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 744 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354008</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in the case involving the interpretation of Section 2(r) Explanation 1-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. It was held that showing the tax separately in the books of accounts was sufficient compliance for claiming deduction, even if not on the sale bills. Additionally, the penalty under Section 12(3)(b) for the assessment year was deemed unjustified, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Case Revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>