https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354007 The High Court quashed the appellate court's decision to allow additional evidence in a case involving a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court emphasized that the power to admit additional evidence should be exercised cautiously and not to fill gaps in the defense case. The appellate court's decision was deemed contrary to legal principles, and the petition was allowed, setting aside the order permitting additional evidence. en-us Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:26:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354007 The High Court quashed the appellate court's decision to allow additional evidence in a case involving a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court emphasized that the power to admit additional evidence should be exercised cautiously and not to fill gaps in the defense case. The appellate court's decision was deemed contrary to legal principles, and the petition was allowed, setting aside the order permitting additional evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354007