https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353999 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the absence of corroborative evidence in a case involving allegations of excisable goods clearance without duty payment. The court emphasized the necessity of supporting charges of clandestine removal with concrete evidence, ruling that demands based solely on statements are unsustainable. The decision allowed the appeals and provided consequential relief to the appellants, stressing the significance of substantiating allegations to uphold duty liabilities and penalties. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353999 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the absence of corroborative evidence in a case involving allegations of excisable goods clearance without duty payment. The court emphasized the necessity of supporting charges of clandestine removal with concrete evidence, ruling that demands based solely on statements are unsustainable. The decision allowed the appeals and provided consequential relief to the appellants, stressing the significance of substantiating allegations to uphold duty liabilities and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353999