https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353994 The ITAT allowed the appeal concerning the delay in filing the appeal before CIT(A) for AY 2009-10, remitting the case for fresh adjudication due to the assessee's misunderstanding. Additionally, the ITAT allowed the appeal against penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for various disallowances in the quantum assessment, citing the invalidity of the penalty notice issued by the AO. The revenue's appeal on penalties was dismissed as infructuous following the ITAT's decision to set aside the penalties. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:25:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353994 The ITAT allowed the appeal concerning the delay in filing the appeal before CIT(A) for AY 2009-10, remitting the case for fresh adjudication due to the assessee's misunderstanding. Additionally, the ITAT allowed the appeal against penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for various disallowances in the quantum assessment, citing the invalidity of the penalty notice issued by the AO. The revenue's appeal on penalties was dismissed as infructuous following the ITAT's decision to set aside the penalties. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353994