<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 728 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, concluding that the TP adjustments made by the TPO and confirmed by the DRP were not justified. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following prescribed methods for determining the ALP and rejected ad hoc adjustments. The decision highlights the need for proper documentation and adherence to agreements in TP matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 728 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, concluding that the TP adjustments made by the TPO and confirmed by the DRP were not justified. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following prescribed methods for determining the ALP and rejected ad hoc adjustments. The decision highlights the need for proper documentation and adherence to agreements in TP matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>