https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353971 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner's order and allowing the appeal. The products in question, classified as Ayurvedic medicinal products, were found to be specifically labeled for medicinal use, distinct from perfumes or toilet waters. The Tribunal emphasized the products' formulation, marketing as medicine, and compliance with Ayurvedic standards, leading to their classification under Chapter 30 instead of Chapter 33. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353971 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner's order and allowing the appeal. The products in question, classified as Ayurvedic medicinal products, were found to be specifically labeled for medicinal use, distinct from perfumes or toilet waters. The Tribunal emphasized the products' formulation, marketing as medicine, and compliance with Ayurvedic standards, leading to their classification under Chapter 30 instead of Chapter 33. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353971