<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 686 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that the appellant-manufacturers were entitled to a refund of excess duty paid along with interest. The decision was based on the finding that no central excise duty was charged from buyers, treating the amount collected as cum-duty price. The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, granting the appellants the relief sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 686 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that the appellant-manufacturers were entitled to a refund of excess duty paid along with interest. The decision was based on the finding that no central excise duty was charged from buyers, treating the amount collected as cum-duty price. The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, granting the appellants the relief sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>