<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 682 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353946</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of items by the Commissioner (Appeals) under Chapter 48 and Chapter 49 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the Order-in-Appeal was confirmed. The respondents were granted consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 682 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353946</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of items by the Commissioner (Appeals) under Chapter 48 and Chapter 49 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and the Order-in-Appeal was confirmed. The respondents were granted consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>