<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 679 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353943</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. It found that the appellant&#039;s business involved negotiated terms, including quantity discounts, with no evidence of additional consideration or suppression of facts. The Tribunal deemed the Show Cause Notice presumptive and lacking substantial basis, entitling the appellant to consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 679 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353943</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. It found that the appellant&#039;s business involved negotiated terms, including quantity discounts, with no evidence of additional consideration or suppression of facts. The Tribunal deemed the Show Cause Notice presumptive and lacking substantial basis, entitling the appellant to consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>