https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197785 The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that the petitioners, as victims and complainants, must first exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal under section 372 before the Sessions Judge/Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi. It emphasized the importance of following judicial hierarchy and exhausting lower forum remedies before approaching higher forums. The denial of Special Leave to Appeal was based on the principle of "ubi jus ibi remedium," indicating that the petitioners had a remedy available under the statutory appeal provision of section 372. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:36:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197785 The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that the petitioners, as victims and complainants, must first exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal under section 372 before the Sessions Judge/Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi. It emphasized the importance of following judicial hierarchy and exhausting lower forum remedies before approaching higher forums. The denial of Special Leave to Appeal was based on the principle of "ubi jus ibi remedium," indicating that the petitioners had a remedy available under the statutory appeal provision of section 372. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197785