https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197784 The Delhi High Court held that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain a suit for trademark infringement filed by the plaintiff against the defendant. The Court found that the plaintiff failed to substantiate business operations or cause of action in Delhi, rendering the claims unsupported. Despite the defendant's trademark registration application in Delhi, it was deemed irrelevant to establish jurisdiction. As a result, the suit was dismissed solely on the basis of lack of territorial jurisdiction, without delving into the case's merits. en-us Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:24:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197784 The Delhi High Court held that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain a suit for trademark infringement filed by the plaintiff against the defendant. The Court found that the plaintiff failed to substantiate business operations or cause of action in Delhi, rendering the claims unsupported. Despite the defendant's trademark registration application in Delhi, it was deemed irrelevant to establish jurisdiction. As a result, the suit was dismissed solely on the basis of lack of territorial jurisdiction, without delving into the case's merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197784