https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197782 Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits a second appeal only where a substantial question of law arises. The Supreme Court stated that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and reversing concurrent findings of fact on title and possession on a purely factual reassessment. Findings recorded by the trial and first appellate courts cannot be disturbed in second appeal merely because another view of the evidence is possible. The effect is that interference with concurrent factual findings is impermissible absent a question of law, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Wed, 26 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:10:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197782 Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits a second appeal only where a substantial question of law arises. The Supreme Court stated that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and reversing concurrent findings of fact on title and possession on a purely factual reassessment. Findings recorded by the trial and first appellate courts cannot be disturbed in second appeal merely because another view of the evidence is possible. The effect is that interference with concurrent factual findings is impermissible absent a question of law, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197782