<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 166 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197780</link>
    <description>Statutory proceedings for registration of occupancy require the land claimed to be identified with sufficient certainty in the notice and application, especially where only part of a survey number is in issue; without boundaries or equivalent particulars, the landowner cannot meet the claim and the process offends fair notice and natural justice. The Tribunal also cannot enlarge the claim and grant occupancy over land beyond the extent sought in the notice or beyond the case made out by the claimant, particularly where revenue records carry a presumption of correctness and no lawful basis is recorded to displace them. An order passed on such a footing is vulnerable as jurisdictionally defective and perverse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:35:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 166 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197780</link>
      <description>Statutory proceedings for registration of occupancy require the land claimed to be identified with sufficient certainty in the notice and application, especially where only part of a survey number is in issue; without boundaries or equivalent particulars, the landowner cannot meet the claim and the process offends fair notice and natural justice. The Tribunal also cannot enlarge the claim and grant occupancy over land beyond the extent sought in the notice or beyond the case made out by the claimant, particularly where revenue records carry a presumption of correctness and no lawful basis is recorded to displace them. An order passed on such a footing is vulnerable as jurisdictionally defective and perverse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>