<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 13 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee accepted the addition, withdrew the appeal to buy peace, and did so on the clear understanding that no penalty would be levied was treated as a finding of fact. On that basis, the Rajasthan HC held that the cancellation of penalty under section 271(1)(c) did not raise any referable question of law under section 256(2), and the reference application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 13 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee accepted the addition, withdrew the appeal to buy peace, and did so on the clear understanding that no penalty would be levied was treated as a finding of fact. On that basis, the Rajasthan HC held that the cancellation of penalty under section 271(1)(c) did not raise any referable question of law under section 256(2), and the reference application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>